Thursday, January 17, 2008

The Fuckin' Degrees - The Reply

This is in response to the comment on "The Fuckin' Degrees" left by "Rich".

Rich,

The reason you are not able to follow my arguments is because you are one of the very same weak-minded people that sites like Sean Cody and Corbin Fisher hope will not use some degree of common sense, so they can keep marketing their sites as ones that show straight men fucking men.

REALITY CHECK - CASH IT AND CASH IT FAST! STRAIGHT MEN DO NOT FUCK MEN. ONLY GAY AND BISEXUAL MEN FUCK MEN.

Your remarks about how they're being actors is totally ludicrous, and shows an extreme lack of logical thinking. I say this because only someone void of logical thinking would not realize the fact, that the rules change between making a porno and a mainstream film. Those rules changes because there is only but so far a male actor can go to play gay in a mainstream movie. For instance, I can believe that Jake Gylenhaal and Heath Ledger are both straight after seeing them in "Brokeback Mountain". They may have gotten naked, they may have simulated a gay sex scene, But NEVER did we see an erect penis go into someone's ass, and both of them shooting a load when all is said and done. WHY? Because that's how far a straight actor will go when they are playing gay. And I say this as someone who has acting as one of my talents since I was a mainstream performer before getting into porn. Now, if we had seen one of their erect penis' going into one of their asses, and/or shooting a load when all is said and done, then "Brokeback Mountain" would have been a porno. Porn does display a fantasy like any other movie, just like you said. But for porn, since male genitalia tells it all, in order to play that fantasy, a male porn actor has to display his true sexual orientation in order to get the job done. And anyone who tells you different is lying to themselves and you.

My friend, Ben Marksman of Knight Stick Films, summed up the issue of these guys who are "gay-for-pay" in the best way. He basically said that these "gay-for-pay" actors are using money as a psychological excuse to display that part of themselves. I'll personally will allow it to be said that they are probably most likely bisexual, but the opposite of myself, meaning that they are bi with a straight preference. But if I can be man enough to admit that I'm bi with a gay preference why can't they show themselves to be a real men, and admit to their bisexuality when they are (1)putting it on clear display for us, and (2)the majority of people I've talk to, have called them "fools" for thinking of themselves as being totally straight.

And they are being called "fools" because they are.

Now as far as this phenomenon of "a str8 guy acting in gay activities", this is where I fault the producers and directors for allowing the guys to lie to themselves. There are just some things that should be left to fantasy, and a straight guy fucking a guy is one of them. IT SHOULD NOT BE ATTEMPTED TO BE PUT IN FRONT OF A CAMERA. For instance, as much as I would love for straight porn star Mark Ashley to stick his thick dick in my ass and pound me with reckless abandon, as far as I know, it will never happen. In fact, I doubt if any man will ever claim to be that lucky. WHY? Because straight porn as far as I know, doesn't put guys in that situation of lying about their sexuality. So why are so many gay porn producers and directors pimping out guys sexuality like that? And why are these guys lowering themselves to let it happen? No one should hold porn, or any industry for that matter in such high regard that they deny displaying who they are. So I hope that all I have said will make people ask, that while the "str8 guy acting in gay activities" is a marketable aspect of the gay porn industry, should it be an aspect of the gay porn industry at all?

7 comments:

  1. ...and who exactly benefits from gay-for-pay models anyway? Not the gay community, that's for sure. Being taken for mugs, that's about it!!

    Rich doesn't understand Tre's point, but I don't understand what Rich's point is...

    ReplyDelete
  2. THANKS KA-OS for your question.
    A reason to follow up.
    I am kind of offended by the words Tre uses in his reply towards my comment. I am not weak minded nor do I lack common sense, nor are my arguments ludicrous nor do I lack logical thinking. I am a person who replies to a log post. Something that should be appreciated instead being downplayed by this choice of words.

    Tre's explanation does make things more clear how he thinks.
    I simply do not agree that guys fucking guys are all gay or bi. Like some straight female actresses are lesbian but know very well how to act with a man in a porn production. It is acting. Like a fake female orgasm.

    A person can be put in a situation where he is forced to put his own sexuality aside in favor of other issues more important.
    Suvival (prison sex).
    Lets say all sexual abuse in general from forced prostitution to incest.

    But i truly believe that the sexual preference can also be set aside in a matter of choice.
    This world is not simply black or white.
    The luxury of success in the porn industry can be a valid reason to put the personal sexual preference aside. So is the choice of working in prostitution a valid reason.

    Of course there are closet cases sucking dick on video.
    But I refuse to accept that the human psyche is that easy to unfold.

    So recap straight men do fuck men in certain circumstances.
    As you see Logic can go different ways. I have my own logic. Let's say a lack of Tre's logical thinking.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Rich, if you were paying attention to the 1st post on this matter, you would have noticed that I already addressed the issue of how some people are forced to put their natural sexuality inside like prison. And yes, someone forced into prostitution will do the same. BUT when you are a MALE citizen of the free world, by being a MALE citizen of the free world, YOU WILL NOT GO OUTSIDE OF YOUR PERSONAL SEXUAL PREFERENCE, UNLESS THAT IS WHAT YOU ARE.
    And I am more than aware that this world is not black and white. However, there are some things that are cut and dry. Do you not have male anatomy yourself to realize that a male can't hide their arousal, the way a woman can. That is what my logical thinking tells me. And if you are offended, your constant dodging the facts I have put right in your face is not my problem. So the case on this matter is CLOSED...NEXT!

    ReplyDelete
  4. In law a case is closed when both parties can state their closing arguments.

    I am not dodging facts I explain a different way of logical thinking.

    I have male anatomy to realize that the mind can be more powerfull than any physical stimuli.
    See how the mind can block pain.
    Why could the mind not block the heterosexual preference ? So that bills can be paid.

    A male can display his arousal by letting the mind take over.
    So again my logic is that a straight man can fuck male butt by sailing on the waves of heterosexual fantasies.

    I can look someone in the eye and not be there.

    Finally your argumentation is not waterproof for a bottom does not need to show arousal. He can be straight relax what he needs to relax to get the actors job done.

    And when getting sucked he closes his eyes and steps on that pussy boat again.

    ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  5. I am not going to entertain your comments anymore because the case is closed when I say it's closed, because BITCH, THIS IS MY BLOG. If you want to have that power to say when the case is closed, then get a life worth living, meaning void of your delusions, and get your own.
    And furthermore, don't ever make comparisons to the U.S. court system on my blog. As many criminals, are freed to commit crime again in this country, you having enough faith in them to use them in your comparison is exactly why I am justified AGAIN in saying that you lack logical thinking.

    ReplyDelete
  6. You have all the right to express your emotions for yes it is your blog.
    i still do appreciate you paying attention to my comments.
    No need to be rude though but again it is your blog.
    So i guess no appeal possible?
    ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  7. As far there being no need to be rude, your words were trying to dictate how I run my blog. My blog is an extension of myself, and any artist will tell you that is a line you respect, therefore DO NOT CROSS. So my words were not words of rudeness - but of justice.
    So NO Rich, there is no appeal possible.

    ReplyDelete

I HIGHLY respect those willing to stand behind their comments with a name. So if you use "Anonymous" on a viewpoint that challenges mine, IT WILL BE DELETED for your cowardice to not show yourself makes your viewpoint and you irrelevant.

Fleshlight Launch

Lust Cinema